In conclusion
Gun owners in California rushed to capitalize on a recent decision by a federal appeals court to overturn a law requiring background checks for ammunition purchases. Some anticipate an appeal from Governor Gavin Newsom.
Greetings from CalMatters, the only nonprofit news organization dedicated exclusively to reporting on topics that impact all Californians. To get the most recent information and analysis on the most significant topics in the Golden State, sign up for WhatMatters.
After a federal court ruling last week overturned a California gun law that mandated in-person background checks at every point of sale, lifelong hunter J.R. Young of San Jose hurried to an online ammo vendor.
Is it Freedom Week? “I said.” I just wanted to know if businesses are now able to ship into the state as a result of the law being struck down.
Nowadays, we don’t want to travel to the store to make a purchase because of the way we live.
Young was among the many hunters, gun lovers, and bullet junkies who silently rejoiced at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision, which may or may not weaken the state’s stringent ammunition procurement regulations.
They are unable to evade the background checks at this time. The in-state background check law remains in effect until the Department of Justice evaluates the case and delivers an official mandate, according to notice sent to gun and ammo dealers four days after the decision.
What will happen to Californians who attempted to order ammunition online prior to that notice is unknown.
Advocates of the Second Amendment have been here before. Since voters enacted Proposition 63, a law that restricted gun ownership, they have contested its constitutionality, and they have received both positive and negative decisions.
This case is being heard in the wake of a historic 2022 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that invalidated a concealed carry statute in New York City and broadly restricted the ability of states and local governments to impose gun control measures.
Neither Governor Gavin Newsom nor Attorney General Rob Bonta have said if the state will challenge the 9th Circuit’s decision to restrict California background checks. Prop. 63 was mostly supported by Newsom, who has defended the state’s gun and ammunition sales limitations as effective in lowering gun crime.
Customers pay a price for the background check under the law, which increased from $1 to $5 per sale only last month. More expensive than that, however, was the implementation of an extra 11% excise tax in 2024 for the Gun Violence Prevention and School Safety Fund, which provides funding for initiatives related to prevention, education, research, response, and investigation. The latest verdict will not affect that tax.
“They’re going to keep pushing and regulating because we live in a one-party state,” said Patrick Jones, who owns a gun store in Redding. Even if this might be a win, it’s difficult to be overly thrilled about it because there will be many more court battles in the future.
After 60 years, Jones Fort is still operating, but the family-run enterprise has seen better days.
He claimed that the industry was dying. It’s no longer a pleasant or friendly business. An industry is destroyed when regulations are applied repeatedly. And in California, that is their goal.
Supporters of gun rights are hoping for an appeal that will maintain the use of background checks.
Kostas Moros of the Second Amendment Foundation stated, “I don’t know why they’ve been so quiet about it.” No, no, we believe this is still in effect. You would think they would want to be the first to express that. However, this resulted in a perplexing situation where out-of-state ammunition merchants were unable to ascertain this.
Moros cited a significant number of false denials that surfaced during the lawsuit, in addition to the obvious constitutionality issue with background checks.
Moros stated, “We’re not dealing here with some reasonable version of this law.” According to the state itself, 11% of those who attempt to utilize it are wrongly denied access. According to the state’s own data, the proportion of false denials to those who were actually prohibited was 411 to 1.
If you were rejected by voter registration one out of ten times, I don’t think we would put up with this. That wouldn’t last long, in my opinion.
Young monitored the tracking details of his munitions shipment from Missouri to Kansas on July 26 while he was in San Jose. He had already been charged for the transaction, but following the Justice Department’s July 28 notice to dealers, MidwayUSA changed its website and stopped selling to California.
On July 30, the two boxes of ammunition he had ordered reached his house. Young, who had previously voiced a fear of losing out on the opportunity at reduced pricing, added, “LOL, impulsiveness paid off.”
“I do prefer to support my local businesses, to be honest,” he remarked. I want to purchase locally since I own a small business. However, the decision on this one simply made me want to know how it stands.
However, Young’s sentiments are not shared by all Californian gun owners and ammo purchasers.
“People are just buying out of state because we’re so close to Oregon and Reno,” Jones remarked in Redding. In addition to seeing a steady drop in sales over time, he has also observed a discernible exodus to places with more gun-friendly laws.
Many of my clients have moved from California to other states, including Tennessee, Utah, Idaho, Texas, and more. They frequently get a lot of freedom in a single day.
Jones, however, stated that he is not leaving his home state in spite of his political hostility. They can escape the tyranny for now, but I think you have to fight it like a disease. It will catch up with you if you don’t confront it head-on.
Joe Garcia works as a Local News fellow in California.
READ NEXT
He confessed to a killing at 21. Is it time for California to give him a second chance?
Newsom moves to close another state prison. That makes 5 since he took office
CalMatters has further information.
Text
Receive breaking news on your mobile device.
Get it here
Use our app to stay up to date.
Register
Get free updates delivered straight to your inbox.
Nonpartisan, independent California news for all
CalMatters is your impartial, nonprofit news source.
Our goal remains crucial, and our journalists are here to empower you.
-
We are independent and nonpartisan.
Our trustworthy journalism is free from partisan politics, free from corporate influence and actually free for all Californians. -
We are focused on California issues.
From the environment to homelessness, economy and more, we publish the unfettered truth to keep you informed. -
We hold people in power accountable.
We probe and reveal the actions and inactions of powerful people and institutions, and the consequences that follow.
However, without the help of readers like you, we are unable to continue.
Give what you can now, please. Every gift makes a difference.
