EN RESUMEN
Since then, a number of states have attempted to enact laws that would allow schools to charge non-citizens with culpable offenses. Ninguna was approved, but the defenders said they intended to pursue the goal.
There is an English version of this article as well.Go here to read it.
Fondos recortes. Around the schools are redadas. excluding professional training and programs like Head Start. The Trump administration has been securing the rights of students without legal status in public schools for months.
Could the administration completely withdraw those students’ right to free public education? According to the experts, that could be the next step.
People are both concerned about this, but this is different, said Patricia G. Andara, an education professor and codirector of UCLA’s Proyecto de Derechos Civiles. We also need to be really vigilant right now. This gentleman is unaffected by anything.
In the 1982 case of Plyler v. Doe, the Supreme Court of the United States guaranteed all students, regardless of their immigration status, the right to free public education in elementary and secondary schools. However, the Heritage Foundation, a conservation organization, asked the Supreme Court to overturn the decision and require that the states compensate immigrant families, even if their children were US citizens. The rationale is that schools spend millions of dollars on these students’ education, money that should instead be used to educate students who, along with their parents, are citizens of the United States by birth.
This vision is reflected in the 2025 Project, which is also published by the Heritage Foundation.
According to the California Institute of Public Policies, such a policy tends to have a depressing effect on the state’s population, since over half of all children have at least one immigrant father.
According to Megan Hopkins, director of the UC San Diego Department of Education, this has significant negative effects. To start, we have a population that is less educated and less well-educated, which has an impact on the economy and, in fact, every other facet of life in California.
Matr cula para no ciudadanos
A case in Texas at the beginning of the 1980s gave rise to the Plyler v. Doe case. The state has approved a law that allows schools to charge non-citizen students tuition. One of the districts that sought it was the Independent School District of Tyler, Texas, a small city 160 kilometers southeast of Dallas. This led to a demand that ultimately brought the case before the Supreme Court.
The Court of Supreme Court ruled in favor of the demandants, stating that non-citizens had the same legal right to protection. Despite the fact that the tribunal was more lenient than it is today, the case was adjusted 5 to 4.
Since then, the fall has occurred practically throughout the olvido. However, there have been occasional attempts to limit the number of immigrants in schools, both in California and elsewhere. In 1994, California voters approved Proposal No. 187, which forbade illegal immigrants from receiving public benefits, such as admission to public schools. Before it became operative, a federal court blocked it.
A law that required schools to gather information about students’ migration status was adopted by Alabama in 2011. This law was later blocked by a federal court. Greg Abbott, the governor of Texas, declared in 2022 that he was in favor of revising the Plyler v. Doey affirms that states shouldn’t be required to pay for students’ education if they don’t have a valid immigration status.
Since the Foundation for Cultural Heritage made its information public, a number of state-run media outlets have attempted to pass laws allowing schools to cover tuition for non-citizens. Ninguna se aproba el an o pasado, pero los defensores say they intend to pursue the goal.
Ruta a la Corte Suprema
They most likely have a sympathetic party in President Donald Trump, who has until to this point adopted many of the policies suggested by Project 2025. Their administration has increased the number of migrant arrests in recent months and stated that they no longer recognize schools as safe havens from authorities. Additionally, it prohibits students without legal status from accessing Head Start, adult education, professional and technical training, and financial aid for migrant students (although these were later restored in response to state demands).
The matter may reach the Supreme Court in no fewer than two ways. A state may enact legislation allowing public schools to cover tuition, which might lead to a demand that could reach the Supreme Court. Trump has the authority to issue an executive order that also includes a demand.
The decan of UC Berkeley’s Faculty of Rights, Erwin Chemerinsky, stated that some of Trump’s actions, such as barring children without a valid Head Start status, are violations of the Plyler Act.
“There is no question that the Trump administration has increased pressure on Plyler,” Chemerinsky said. Without a doubt, Trump’s actions could result in cases that reach the Supreme Court. Could you please reverse Plyler’s decision? Claro que s. Bastar a con que quisieran anularly cinco jueces.
Hopkins of the University of California, San Diego, asserts that even if they are not reversed, the current policy changes have had a negative impact on immigrant families and schools.Educational assistance has reduced the number of communities experiencing anti-immigration measures, which has had negative effects on some students’ academic performance and increased the gap in performance between Latino students and other groups. An analysis of California’s policies for education reveals that Latino and English language learners had lower scores in math and English after being arrested for immigration in their communities, and it also reports a notable rise in academic apathy.
Hopkins also affirms that policies are not particularly effective. Research has shown that if the goal is to encourage immigrants to return voluntarily to their countries of origin, this rarely happens. Many families just moved to Mississippi when Alabama’s anti-immigrant law was approved in 2011.
Nuestro mayor miedo
According to Deneen Guss, head of the Monterey County Office of Education, the new policies have caused fear and confusion among immigrant families in the county. In addition to schools, community events have also seen a decline in attendance.
In order to support the families, the schools have been holding information nights to help them understand their rights (both in person and virtually), have helped parents present plans for child care to the schools in the event that a parent is arrested, have given out flyers about how to help children who are experiencing anxiety, and have offered a wide range of legal and other resources.
However, when the Trump administration announced that students without legal status would not be allowed to enroll in Head Start, I started to think,” Guss said. I came to believe that Plyler was actually the one. This is our greatest fear.
Le preocupa el impacto que esto tendr a en las familias, as como en el personal escolar, que de repente ser a responsable de verificar la documentaci n de ciudadan a de los estudiantes. Currently, schools do not inquire about the students’ migration status.
“The work that educators do is really challenging,” Guss said. Our job is to give the kids the best education possible. They don’t force us to become immigration agents. It is a place we do not want.
Ha estado instando a los padres y al p blico a mantenerse informados y alzar la voz. Independientemente de si la Corte Suprema revoca la decisi n de Plyler, es casi seguro que las pol ticas antiinmigrantes continuar n, con consecuencias devastadoras para los estudiantes.
No podemos quedarnos de brazos cruzados y fingir que todo va a estar bien , dijo Guss. La gente necesita asegurarse de que su voz sea escuchada. Y tenemos que luchar por nuestros hijos .
CalMatters has further information.
Text
Receive breaking news on your mobile device.
Get it here
Use our app to stay up to date.
Register
Get free updates delivered straight to your inbox.
Nonpartisan, independent California news for all
CalMatters is your impartial, nonprofit news source.
Our goal remains crucial, and our journalists are here to empower you.
-
We are independent and nonpartisan.
Our trustworthy journalism is free from partisan politics, free from corporate influence and actually free for all Californians. -
We are focused on California issues.
From the environment to homelessness, economy and more, we publish the unfettered truth to keep you informed. -
We hold people in power accountable.
We probe and reveal the actions and inactions of powerful people and institutions, and the consequences that follow.
However, without the help of readers like you, we are unable to continue.
Give what you can now, please. Every gift makes a difference.
